Pivot‑TR / Pivot Bridge®

Temporary implant

Stabilize today. Decide what comes next.

Pivot Bridge® is a temporary, flow-aligned spacer for secondary tricuspid regurgitation, designed to stabilize high‑risk patients and prepare them for definitive therapy.

Pivot Bridge® device renderAdobe Stock preview · not licensed
Pivot Bridge®

Technology

A short-term preoperative stabilization device, placed for up to three weeks prior to definitive treatment.

Pivot Bridge® reduces TR while the patient’s condition is optimized, and helps clinicians assess how the heart responds before committing to surgery, transcatheter repair, or replacement.

Watch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Procedure

Quick to place. Designed to come out.

Pivot Bridge® is placed through the femoral vein with standard catheter techniques and minimal reliance on advanced imaging, suited to critically ill patients who need pre-operative stabilization.

  1. 01Femoral vein
  2. 02Inferior vena cava
  3. 03Right atrium
  4. 04Pulmonary artery
Up to 3 weeks

temporary implantation

~60 min

estimated procedure time

47 min

mean procedure time in the first‑in‑human study

Pivot Bridge seen from every angle. Device rendering.
The spiral anchor stays fixed in the IVC while the distal anchor and spacer move with the heart, keeping the device aligned with cardiac motion. Device rendering.

Components

Three parts, no fixation.

Tricuspid valve IVC PA
Schematic, not to scale.

IVC anchor

A spiral structure in the inferior vena cava holds the proximal end without sutures, clips, or tissue penetration.

Benefits

Designed around the patient and the procedure.

Stabilize
Stabilize
Immediate TR reduction
In the first‑in‑human study, TR was reduced by at least one grade in every patient.
Flow through the device
Flow windows let blood pass through and around the spacer.
Self-centering
Stays centered within the valve during systole.
Reversible
Reversible
Designed for removal
Fully catheter-retrievable, or removed manually at the time of surgery.
Non-fixated anchoring
IVC and PA anchors hold the device without tissue penetration.
Leaflet integrity
Supports coaptation without leaflet fixation or trauma.
Prepare
Prepare
Bridge to definitive therapy
A path to surgery, transcatheter repair, or replacement.
Diagnostic insight
Shows how the heart responds to TR reduction before a permanent decision.
For fragile patients
Rapid, fluoroscopy-guided placement for critically ill patients.

Clinical rationale

A staged reduction strategy for frail and high-risk patients.

Pivot Bridge® provides temporary tricuspid regurgitation (TR) reduction, allowing clinicians to stabilize high-risk patients and assess how the heart responds before committing to definitive therapy.

Why a staged reduction

Gradual step-down reduction of TR may remove the risk of abrupt changes to ventricular loading prior to surgical intervention.

LV · Abrupt correctionLV · Gradual correctionRV · Abrupt correctionRV · Gradual correction

Abrupt correction produces a transient stress peak; gradual correction blunts that response.

Ventricular wall stress after TR correction (simulation)

02040600102030Max. fibre stress (kPa)Simulated cycles

Redrawn from cardiovascular modelling of tricuspid regurgitation correction by Walmsley et al., EuroIntervention 2019.1 Values are simulated, not patient measurements.

  1. 01

    Avoid abrupt hemodynamic stress

    Sudden elimination of severe TR can impose an acute loading change on a failing right ventricle. A staged reduction may help soften that transition.

  2. 02

    Stabilize before a permanent decision

    Temporary TR reduction may improve congestion and overall clinical status, helping some patients reach a better condition for definitive therapy.

  3. 03

    Allow time for evaluation and optimization

    A temporary implant can create time for additional assessment, medical optimization, and multidisciplinary planning before surgery or transcatheter intervention.

  4. 04

    Potentially broaden treatment options

    Anatomical or clinical improvement may bring some patients once considered high-risk or suboptimal back into consideration for surgical repair, replacement, or transcatheter repair.

Key takeawayTemporary TR reduction may stabilize frail patients, support right-heart recovery, and create a clearer path to definitive therapy.

Older woman with her family at homeAdobe Stock preview · not licensed

Designed to give high‑risk patients a safer path to definitive treatment.

Full specifications

ShowHide
Intended use
Pre-habilitation and diagnostic use, in preparation for definitive therapy
Target disease
Secondary tricuspid regurgitation
TR severity treated
Inclusive of massive and torrential TR
Target population
High-risk, frail, or inoperable patients with severe TR
Implant duration
Temporary, up to 3 weeks
Deployment
Transfemoral venous access, transcatheter
Removal
Removable by transcatheter retrieval, or manually at the time of surgery
Anchoring
Atraumatic, non-fixated anchoring (IVC + PA)
Spacer design
Self-centering oblong spacer with flow apertures
Valve interaction
Supports leaflet coaptation without fixation or leaflet trauma
Flow preservation
Designed for hemodynamic flow through and around the device
Adaptability
Dynamic self-centering, adaptable to progressive cardiac remodeling
Procedural setting
Percutaneous intervention in the cath lab or hybrid OR
Customization
Bridge to surgery, transcatheter repair, or replacement
Imaging
Fluoroscopy-guided; TEE or ICE not required
Retrievability
Fully catheter-retrievable; designed for removal
Est. procedure time
About 60 minutes
Learning curve
Low; designed for rapid adoption by interventional teams

Specifications as provided by Tau Medical. Investigational device, not commercially available.

Compare the two devices.

Pivot Extend and Pivot Bridge share one platform and differ in intended use and duration.

References

  1. Walmsley J, Squara P, Wolfhard U, Cornelussen R, Lumens J. Impact of abrupt versus gradual correction of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation: a modelling study. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(10):902-911. eurointervention.pcronline.com